Seven comparable June-ended windows · 2020–2026

UK Regular Forces:
joining versus leaving.

Published 12-month intake and total outflow show a net negative rounded gap in the year to June 2023 and a positive gap in the year to June 2026. A net movement is not a candidate selection pass rate.

Rounded 2023 gap−5,990Intake 10,470, outflow 16,460
Rounded 2026 gap+1,450Intake 14,500, outflow 13,050
MOD 2026 narrative+1,460Official text, not the subtraction of rounded displayed figures

UK Regular Forces intake and outflow

Each row is 12 months ending 30 June, not a financial year or a count of unique applicants.
Year endedAll Regular intakeAll Regular outflowRounded arithmeticMOD release
202015,25014,310+940MOD 2020 ↗
202117,35012,870+4,480MOD 2021 ↗
202212,60015,520−2,920MOD 2022 ↗
202310,47016,460−5,990MOD 2023 ↗
202411,94015,710−3,770MOD 2024 ↗
202513,52014,020−500MOD 2025 ↗
202614,50013,050+1,450MOD 2026 ↗

Why do 2026 figures appear inconsistent?

The revised MOD report prints 14,500 joiners and 13,050 leavers. Subtraction produces +1,450, but the official narrative gives +1,460. This difference may be caused by calculation on unrounded underlying data; the underlying exact cell values are not supplied in the rounded table. Report the distinction rather than altering either number.

How not to use this series

Application records are not unique people, intake is not a matched applicant cohort, and total outflow is distinct from the trained/trade-trained Voluntary Outflow metric. These seven windows do not measure the probability of passing any military selection, or establish why recruitment and attrition changed.

Suggested carefully qualified line: “Project Selection’s source-linked comparison of MOD reports finds the rounded annual UK Regular joiners-minus-leavers balance moved from −5,990 in the year ending June 2023 to +1,450 in the year ending June 2026. Official MOD commentary uses slightly different net figures due to the reporting precision.”

Read the voluntary-outflow evidence ↗Check common misleading interpretations ↗